Advanced Daylighting TopicsNonresidential Lighting
Codes and Standards Enhancement (CASE) Report
The Statewide CASE Team 2019 Title 24, Part 6 Final CASE Report is available below. The Final CASE Report incorporates feedback received during utility-sponsored stakeholder meetings, Energy Commission Pre-Rulemaking workshops, and personal communication with stakeholders. We encourage stakeholders to email feedback on the Final CASE Report to email@example.com. You can also participate in the 2019 Title 24, Part 6 Standards updated by attending the Energy Commission workshops and submitting written comments to the rulemaking docket. Refer to the Pre-Rulemaking and Rulemaking Workshop Notices for instructions on how to submit comments to the Energy Commission’s docket (available here).
Proposal A: Power Adjustment Factors
The proposed measure will allow Power Adjustment Factors (PAFs)* and performance compliance options (PCOs) for indoor lighting that are controlled by daylighting controls when certain technologies are installed in the proposed building. The PAFs and PCOs may be applied to any nonresidential building subject to the provisions of Title 24, Part 6.
The proposed technologies include: fixed slats (louvers), light shelves, clerestories, and daylight redirecting devices. These technologies tend to increase the daylight potential (area or number of hours) of a space.
Previously, no credit could be taken for certain innovative technologies that increase the daylight potential of a space. Offering PAFs and PCOs for these encourages their use. It is possible that the introduction of these technologies into the 2019 update may provide a gradual path to their prescriptive requirement in future updates.
The Statewide CASE Team completed a detailed analysis to determine the appropriate PAFs for all daylighting devices. This report documents the methodology and assumptions used in the analysis. Electric lighting energy impacts were included in the savings analysis but heating, ventilation and air-conditioning energy impacts were not.
Proposal B: Min VT Interpretation for TDDs
An interpretation of the Minimum Visible Transmittance (Min VT) requirement for plastic skylights (Table 140.3-C) is proposed for Tubular Daylighting Devices (TDDs). This is based on a new National Fenestration Rating Council (NFRC) Test Procedure (NFRC 203) for TDDs.
Proposal C: Update to Daylit Zones Definitions
An update to the Skylit Daylit Zone definition is proposed to ensure proper interpretation for skylights in atriums, and to the Sidelit Daylit Zones definition for building with large exterior overhangs.
*Power Adjustment Factors are multipliers on the proposed design’s lighting power. From a compliance perspective they effectively reduce the proposed design’s lighting power. As such, a higher lighting power may be reduced enough to meet the maximum allowed lighting power of Title 24, Part 6.
Request for Feedback
The Statewide Utility Team encourages participation in the CASE Report development process through the submission of data—both primary sources and references to existing data. We are requesting data on areas such as energy savings, costs, market impacts, industry practices, barriers to code compliance, etc. from stakeholders. The data will inform the energy savings estimates, cost-effectiveness analysis, compliance and enforcement, and market impacts that will be presented in CASE Reports.
Do you have feedback or data to share? Send us an email at firstname.lastname@example.org.